Question Luis on LWM2 and LWM3 bgls...
Posted: Sat May 30, 2009 6:02 pm
Hey Luis,
Got a question for you regarding good ol' hi-res using your "make flattons" procedure.
I created some mesh. I have my hi-res photos too. I create the LWM2 and LWM3 flatton polygons. I discard the LWM2 bgl file.
Now I use the same mesh but I have dropped down all the altitudes of the mesh by -10 meters. I have done this before I put it into a readable format of SBuilder. So I create a 2nd set of LWM2 and LWM3 bgls based from that mesh. This time I discard the LWM3 bgl file.
I put together the LWM3.bgl from the normal height mesh and combine with the LWM2.bgl from the -10 meter mesh. Should I not see a "gap" between the two layers in FS2004? I would think so but I am not. The LWM3 seems to adhere or attach itself right on top of the LWM2 layer even though they were created with different elevations?????
Any thoughts?
thx,
Clutch
Got a question for you regarding good ol' hi-res using your "make flattons" procedure.
I created some mesh. I have my hi-res photos too. I create the LWM2 and LWM3 flatton polygons. I discard the LWM2 bgl file.
Now I use the same mesh but I have dropped down all the altitudes of the mesh by -10 meters. I have done this before I put it into a readable format of SBuilder. So I create a 2nd set of LWM2 and LWM3 bgls based from that mesh. This time I discard the LWM3 bgl file.
I put together the LWM3.bgl from the normal height mesh and combine with the LWM2.bgl from the -10 meter mesh. Should I not see a "gap" between the two layers in FS2004? I would think so but I am not. The LWM3 seems to adhere or attach itself right on top of the LWM2 layer even though they were created with different elevations?????
Any thoughts?
thx,
Clutch